corner
corner

Phys. Rev. C 79, 064304 (2009) [38 pages]

Heavy-element fission barriers

Download: PDF (1,745 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Peter Möller1,*, Arnold J. Sierk1, Takatoshi Ichikawa2, Akira Iwamoto3, Ragnar Bengtsson4, Henrik Uhrenholt4, and Sven Åberg4
1Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
2RIKEN Nishina Center, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
3Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
4Department of Mathematical Physics, Lund Institute of Technology, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden

Received 10 July 2008; published 3 June 2009

We present calculations of fission properties for heavy elements. The calculations are based on the macroscopic-microscopic finite-range liquid-drop model with a 2002 parameter set. For each nucleus we have calculated the potential energy in three different shape parametrizations: (1) for 5 009 325 different shapes in a five-dimensional deformation space given by the three-quadratic-surface parametrization, (2) for 10 850 different shapes in a three-dimensional deformation space spanned by ε2, ε4, and γ in the Nilsson perturbed-spheroid parametrization, supplemented by a densely spaced grid in ε2, ε3, ε4, and ε6 for axially symmetric deformations in the neighborhood of the ground state, and (3) an axially symmetric multipole expansion of the shape of the nuclear surface using β2, β3, β4, and β6 for intermediate deformations. For a fissioning system, it is always possible to define uniquely one saddle or fission threshold on the optimum trajectory between the ground state and separated fission fragments. We present such calculated barrier heights for 1585 nuclei from Z=78 to Z=125. Traditionally, actinide barriers have been characterized in terms of a “double-humped” structure. Following this custom we present calculated energies of the first peak, second minimum, and second peak in the barrier for 135 actinide nuclei from Th to Es. However, for some of these nuclei which exhibit a more complex barrier structure, there is no unique way to extract a double-humped structure from the calculations. We give examples of such more complex structures, in particular the structure of the outer barrier region near 232Th and the occurrence of multiple fission modes. Because our complete results are too extensive to present in a paper of this type, our aim here is limited: (1) to fully present our model and the methods for determining the structure of the potential-energy surface, (2) to present fission thresholds for a large number of heavy elements, (3) to compare our results with the two-humped barrier structure deduced from experiment for actinide nuclei, and (4) to compare to additional fission-related data and other fission models.

© 2009 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064304
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064304
PACS:
21.10.Dr, 21.10.Hw, 21.10.Re, 21.60.-n