Phys. Rev. C
75,
025201
(2007)
[33 pages]
Recoil polarization measurements for neutral pion electroproduction at Q2=1(GeV/c)2 near the Δ resonance
J. J. Kelly et al. Jefferson Laboratory E91011 and Hall A Collaborations
Show All Authors/Affiliations
Hide All Authors/Affiliations
J. J. Kelly1, O. Gayou2, R. E. Roché3, Z. Chai2, M. K. Jones4, A. J. Sarty5, S. Frullani6, K. Aniol7, E. J. Beise1, F. Benmokhtar8, W. Bertozzi2, W. U. Boeglin9, T. Botto10, E. J. Brash11, H. Breuer1, E. Brown12, E. Burtin13, J. R. Calarco14, C. Cavata13, C. C. Chang1, N. S. Chant1, J.-P. Chen4, M. Coman9, D. Crovelli8, R. De Leo6, S. Dieterich8, S. Escoffier13, K. G. Fissum15, V. Garde16, F. Garibaldi6, S. Georgakopoulos10, S. Gilad2, R. Gilman8, C. Glashausser8, J.-O. Hansen4, D. W. Higinbotham2, A. Hotta17, G. M. Huber11, H. Ibrahim18, M. Iodice6, C. W. de Jager4, X. Jiang8, A. Klimenko18, A. Kozlov11, G. Kumbartzki8, M. Kuss4, L. Lagamba6, G. Laveissière16, J. J. LeRose4, R. A. Lindgren19, N. Liyange4, G. J. Lolos11, R. W. Lourie20, D. J. Margaziotis7, F. Marie13, P. Markowitz9, S. McAleer3, D. Meekins3, R. Michaels4, B. D. Milbrath21, J. Mitchell4, J. Nappa8, D. Neyret13, C. F. Perdrisat22, M. Potokar23, V. A. Punjabi24, T. Pussieux13, R. D. Ransome8, P. G. Roos1, M. Rvachev2, A. Saha4, S. Širca2, R. Suleiman2, S. Strauch8, J. A. Templon12, L. Todor18, P. E. Ulmer18, G. M. Urciuoli6, L. B. Weinstein18, K. Wijsooriya25, B. Wojtsekhowski4, X. Zheng2, and L. Zhu2 (Jefferson Laboratory E91011 and Hall A Collaborations)
1Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 2Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 3Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA 4Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA 5Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3C3 6Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione Sanità and Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Physics Laboratory, I-00161 Roma, Italy 7California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90032, USA 8Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA 9Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA 10University of Athens, Athens, Greece 11University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2 12University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA 13CEA Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 14University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA 15University of Lund, Box 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden 16Université Blaise Pascal Clermont Ferrand et CNRS/IN2P3 LPC 63, 177 Aubière Cedex, France 17University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA 18Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA 19University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901, USA 20Renaissance Technologies Corporation, Setauket, New York 11733, USA 21Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475, USA 22College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA 23Institut Jożef Stefan, University of Ljubljana, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia 24Norfolk State University, Norfolk, Virginia 23504, USA 25University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Received 2 September 2005; revised 17 November 2006; published 12 February 2007
We measured angular distributions of differential cross section, beam analyzing power, and recoil polarization for neutral pion electroproduction at Q2=1.0 (GeV/c)2 in 10 bins of 1.17⩽W⩽1.35 GeV across the Δ resonance. A total of 16 independent response functions were extracted, of which 12 were observed for the first time. Comparisons with recent model calculations show that response functions governed by real parts of interference products are determined relatively well near the physical mass, W=MΔ≈1.232 GeV, but the variation among models is large for response functions governed by imaginary parts, and for both types of response functions, the variation increases rapidly with W>MΔ. We performed a multipole analysis that adjusts suitable subsets of ℓπ⩽2 amplitudes with higher partial waves constrained by baseline models. This analysis provides both real and imaginary parts. The fitted multipole amplitudes are nearly model independent—there is very little sensitivity to the choice of baseline model or truncation scheme. By contrast, truncation errors in the traditional Legendre analysis of N→Δ quadrupole ratios are not negligible. Parabolic fits to the W dependence around MΔ for the multiple analysis gives values for Re(S1+/M1+)=(-6.61±0.18)% and Re(E1+/M1+)=(-2.87±0.19)% for the pπ0 channel at W=1.232 GeV and Q2=1.0 (GeV/c)2 that are distinctly larger than those from the Legendre analysis of the same data. Similarly, the multipole analysis gives Re(S0+/M1+)=(+7.1±0.8)% at W=1.232 GeV, consistent with recent models, while the traditional Legendre analysis gives the opposite sign because its truncation errors are quite severe.
© 2007 The American Physical Society
URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.025201
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevC.75.025201
PACS:
24.70.+s, 14.20.Gk, 13.60.Le, 13.40.Gp
|
|