corner
corner

Phys. Rev. C 66, 044602 (2002) [7 pages]

Tracking the phase-transition energy in the disassembly of hot nuclei

Download: PDF (148 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

C. B. Das1, S. Das Gupta1, L. Beaulieu2, T. Lefort3,*, K. Kwiatkowski3,†, V. E. Viola3, S. J. Yennello4, L. Pienkowski5, R. G. Korteling6, and H. Breuer7
1Physics Department, McGill University, Montréal, Canada H3A 2T8
2Department de Physique, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada G1K 7P4
3Department of Chemistry and IUCF, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
4Department of Chemistry and Cyclotron Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
5Heavy Ion Laboratory, Warsaw University, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
6Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
7Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

Received 21 June 2002; published 7 October 2002

In efforts to determine phase transitions in the disintegration of highly excited heavy nuclei, a popular practice is to parametrize the yields of isotopes as a function of temperature in the form Y(z)=z-τf(zσ(T-T0)), where Y(z)’s are the measured yields and τ, σ, and T0 are fitted to the yields. Here T0 would be interpreted as the phase transition temperature. For finite systems such as those obtained in nuclear collisions, this parametrization is only approximate and hence allows for extraction of T0 in more than one way. In this work we look in detail at how values of T0 differ, depending on methods of extraction. It should be mentioned that for finite systems, this approximate parametrization works not only at the critical point, but also for first-order phase transitions (at least in some models). Thus the approximate fit is no guarantee that one is seeing a critical phenomenon. A different but more conventional search for the nuclear phase transition would look for a maximum in the specific heat as a function of temperature T2. In this case T2 is interpreted as the phase transition temperature. Ideally T0 and T2 would coincide. We invesigate this possibility, both in theory and from the ISiS data, performing both canonical (T) and microcanonical (e=E*/A) calculations. Although more than one value of T0 can be extracted from the approximate parametrization, the work here points to the best value from among the choices. Several interesting results, seen in theoretical calculations, are borne out in experiment.

© 2002 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044602
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevC.66.044602
PACS:
25.70.-z, 25.75.Ld

*Present address: Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire de Caen, F-14050 Caen Cedex, France.

Present address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545.