corner
corner

Phys. Rev. C 58, 2126–2132 (1998)

Potential energy surfaces of superheavy nuclei

Download: PDF (166 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

M. Bender1,2,*, K. Rutz1,3, P.-G. Reinhard2,4, J. A. Maruhn1,4, and W. Greiner1,4
1Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Frankfurt, Robert-Mayer-Strasse 10, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
2Institut für Theoretische Physik II, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Staudtstrasse 7, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
3Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung mbH, Planckstrasse 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
4Joint Institute for Heavy-Ion Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

Received 7 May 1998; published in the issue dated October 1998

We investigate the structure of the potential energy surfaces of the superheavy nuclei 158258Fm100, 156264Hs108, 166278112, 184298114, and 172292120 within the framework of self-consistent nuclear models, i.e., the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approach and the relativistic mean-field model. We compare results obtained with one representative parametrization of each model which is successful in describing superheavy nuclei. We find systematic changes as compared to the potential energy surfaces of heavy nuclei in the uranium region: there is no sufficiently stable fission isomer any more, the importance of triaxial configurations to lower the first barrier fades away, and asymmetric fission paths compete down to rather small deformation. Comparing the two models, it turns out that the relativistic mean-field model gives generally smaller fission barriers.

© 1998 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.2126
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevC.58.2126
PACS:
21.30.Fe, 21.60.Jz, 24.10.Jv, 27.90.+b

*Present address: Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, The University of North Carolina, CB 3255, Phillips Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.