corner
corner

Phys. Rev. C 50, 48–73 (1994)

Antiproton-proton partial-wave analysis below 925 MeV/c

Download: PDF (1,472 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

R. Timmermans, Th. A. Rijken, and J. J. de Swart
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 30 September 1993; published in the issue dated July 1994

A partial-wave analysis of all p¯p scattering data below 925 MeV/c antiproton laboratory momentum is presented. The method used is adapted from the Nijmegen phase-shift analyses of pp and np scattering data. We solve the Schrödinger equation for the coupled p¯p and n¯n channels where the long- and intermediate-range interactions are described by a theoretically well-founded potential. This gives the rapid variations of the scattering amplitudes with energy. This potential consists of the Coulomb potential with the main relativistic correction, the magnetic-moment interaction, the one-pion-exchange potential, and the heavy-boson exchanges of the Nijmegen one-boson-exchange potential. Slow variations of the amplitudes due to short-range interactions, including the coupling to mesonic annihilation channels, are parametrized by an energy-dependent, complex boundary condition, specified at a radius of r=1.3 fm. The Nijmegen 1993 p¯p database, consisting of 3646 p¯p scattering data, is presented and discussed. The best fit to this database results in χmin2/Ndata=1.043. This good fit to the data shows that the Nijmegen long- and intermediate-range potential is essentially correct. The pseudovector coupling constant of the charged pion to nucleons is determined to be fc2=0.0732(11) at the pion pole, where the error is statistical.

© 1994 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.50.48
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevC.50.48
PACS:
13.75.Cs, 11.80.Et

See Also

Comment: Jean-Marc Richard, Comment on ‘‘Antiproton-proton partial-wave analysis below 925 MeV/c’’, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1143 (1995).

Reply: R. Timmermans, Th. A. Rijken, and J. J. de Swart, Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Antiproton-proton partial-wave analysis below 925 MeV/c’ ’’, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1145 (1995).